Home | Purpose WCF6 WCF5 WCF4 | WCF3 | WCF2 | WCF1 | Regional | People | Family Update | Newsletter | Press | Search | DONATE | THC 

zz

  Current Issue | Archives: 2010; '07; '06; '05; '04; '03; '02; '01 | SwanSearch | Subscribe | Change Address | Unsubscribe

zz

 

Family Update, Online!

Volume 07  Issue 24 13 June 2006
Topic: Marriage Amendment

Family Fact: Senate Inaction

Family Quote: UN Rights Right

Family Abstract: Avoiding Wedlock - or Just Postponing It?

Family Fact of the Week: Senate Inaction TOP of PAGE

The Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to the Consideration of S. J. Resolution 1: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage (A.K.A.: Marriage Protection Amendment), failed to meet the two-third supermajority vote required, 49 to 48 opposed.

Find out how your Senators voted by following this link: http://www.senate.gov

(Source:  The United States Senate, "S. J. Resolution 1: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage," June 7, 2006; http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SJ00001:.)
Family Quote of the Week: UN Rights Right TOP of PAGE

"Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State."

(Source:  General Assembly of the United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 16, Sections 1-3, December 10, 1948; http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.)
For More Information TOP of PAGE

The Howard Center and The World Congress of Families stock a number of pro-family books, including The Retreat From Marriage: Causes & Consequences, edited by Bryce Christensen. Please visit:

    The Howard Center Bookstore   

 Call: 1-815-964-5819    USA: 1-800-461-3113    Fax: 1-815-965-1826    Contact: Bookstore 

934 North Main Street Rockford, Illinois 61103

Family Research Abstract of the Week: Avoiding Wedlock - or Just Postponing It? TOP of PAGE

Demographers have marveled at the remarkable "retreat from marriage" witnessed in recent decades in the United States - and other industrialized countries. However, in a new study published in Population Studies, researchers at Pennsylvania State University conclude that though many young Americans are postponing marriage, relatively few are actually avoiding wedlock.

The Penn State scholars acknowledge that in the fall of the marriage rate during the final decades of the 20th century, many have discerned "a sea change in the social and demographic behaviour of Western populations ... brought about by fundamental shifts towards ideologies that emphasize individual autonomy."  These scholars' own analysis, however, suggests that the retreat from wedlock is actually more pronounced in Europe than in the United States, where almost all young adults still do eventually marry, even though at later ages than in the past.

That Americans are older when marrying than in the past is very clear: the Penn State researchers calculate that in 2000 the average age at first marriage was 28.3 years for grooms, 26.3 years for brides, compared to 23.0 years for grooms and 20.8 years for brides in 1970. However, the Penn State scholars' statistical model indicates that even though Americans coming of age at the turn of the 21st century have postponed wedlock, the overwhelming majority - 89% of men and 91% of women - will eventually marry.

Past generations of Americans, it is true, saw a higher percentage of men and women marry: among Americans who came of age at the end of the Sixties, 97% of men and 97% of women married. Thus, though the data do indicate "a real decline in marriage" in the United States, that decline is "considerably smaller" than it has appeared to demographers who have prematurely misinterpreted numbers indicating delayed marriage as evidence of permanent singleness. Properly adjusted, the numbers still attest to the abiding - if somewhat belated - attraction of marriage for 21st-century American men and women.

(Source: Robert Schoen and Vladimir Canudas-Romo, "Timing effects on first marriage: Twentieth-century experience in England and Wales and the USA," Population Studies 59 [2005]: 135-146.)
 

NOTE:

1. If you would like to receive this weekly email and be added to the Howard Center mailing list: Click Here to Subscribe 

2. Please invest in our efforts to reach more people with a positive message of family, religion and society. Click Here to Donate Online

3. Please remember the Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society in your will. Click Here for Details

4. If applicable, please add us to your 'approved', 'buddy', 'safe' or 'trusted sender' list to prevent your ISP's filter from blocking future email messages.

 

 

 

 

 

 Home | Purpose WCF6 WCF5 WCF4 | WCF3 | WCF2 | WCF1 | Regional | People | Family Update | Newsletter | Press | Search | DONATE | THC 

 

 

Copyright © 1997-2012 The Howard Center: Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required. |  contact: webmaster