|
|
zz |
|
zz
|
Family Update, Online!
|
Volume 06 Issue
46 |
15 November 2005 |
|
"In November 1919, President Wilson proclaimed November 11 as the first commemoration of Armistice Day with the following words: 'To us in America, the reflections of Armistice Day will be filled with solemn pride in the heroism of those who died in the country's service and with gratitude for the victory, both because of the thing from which it has freed us and because of the opportunity it has given America to show her sympathy with peace and justice in the councils of the nations...'"
"The first celebration using the term Veterans Day occurred in Birmingham, Alabama, in 1947. Raymond Weeks, a World War II veteran, organized "National Veterans Day," which included a parade and other festivities, to honor all veterans. The event was held on November 11, then designated Armistice Day. Later, U.S. Representative Edward Rees of Kansas proposed a bill that would change Armistice Day to Veterans Day. In 1954, Congress passed the bill that President Eisenhower signed proclaiming November 11 as Veterans Day. Raymond Weeks received the Presidential Citizens Medal from President Reagan in November 1982. Weeks' local parade and ceremonies are now an annual event celebrated nationwide."
|
(Source: "The History of Veterans Day," and "The Origins of Veterans Day," The United States Department of Veterans Affairs; http://www1.va.gov/opa/vetsday/vetdayhistory.htm and http://www1.va.gov/opa/feature/celebrate/vetday.htm.)
|
"Thank you."
|
(Source: John E. Shields III, the editor's five-year-old son, to his great-grandfather, John E. Shields, Jr., 11 November 2005.)
|
Editor's Note:
Upon picking up my son from his public elementary school this past Thursday, he asked me if he could call his [great-]grandfather. I asked him, "Why do you want to call Grandpa Shields?" John replied, "Tomorrow is Veterans Day, and Grandpa was a soldier, and this week in school we learned that Veterans Day is a day to say 'thank you' to the soldiers. So I want to call to tell him thank you."
John ended up calling both of his great-grandfathers and one grandfather-all who had served in the armed forces--with a five-year-old's earnest message: Thank you.
So we at The Howard Center for Family, Religion, and Society remember those who served, and those who serve today, who allow us the security to raise our Families, to exercise our Religions, and protect a free Society. Thank you.
Karl John Shields, editor, Family Update.
The Howard Center and The World Congress of Families stock a number of pro-family books, including The Structure of Freedom: Correlations, Causes, and Cautions, volume 14 of the Encounter Series, edited by Richard John Neuhaus. Please visit:
|
Family Research Abstract of the Week: Not All There |
TOP of PAGE |
Among the children struggling with intellectual disabilities, a disproportionate number must do so without a father. That fatherless children are especially vulnerable to mild to moderate intellectual disability stands out as one of the chief findings of a study recently published in Social Science & Medicine by a team of researchers at the University of Western Australia.
Examining nine years of data for Western Australians with and without intellectual disabilities, the authors of the new study underscore the importance of maternal marital status as a statistical predictor of children's intellectual status: "Women who had never married (O[dds] R[atio] = 2.18) and women who were widowed, divorced, or separated (O[dds] R[atio] = 2.40] were more likely to have a child with a mild-moderate I[ntellectual]D[isability] than those who were married."
The Western Australian scholars acknowledge that "marital status has not always been reported in previous studies" of children's intellectual disability. However, they stress that "the increased risk for mild-moderate I[ntellectual]D[isability] persisted in the logistic regression model" that accounted for variations in social, economic, and ethnic backgrounds. Understandably, the researchers view their "findings of an elevated likelihood of mild-moderate I[ntellectual] D[isability] with sole parent status" in the context of "higher levels of social disadvantage."
|
(Source: Helen Leonard et al., "Association of sociodemographic characteristics of children with intellectual disability in Western Australia," Social Science & Medicine 60 [2005]: 1499-1513.)
|
|
NOTE:
1. If you would like to
receive this weekly email and be added to the Howard Center
mailing list: Click
Here to Subscribe
2. Please invest in our
efforts to reach more people with a positive message of family,
religion and society.
Click
Here to Donate Online
3. Please remember the
Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society in your will. Click
Here for Details
4.
If applicable, please add us to your 'approved', 'buddy', 'safe'
or 'trusted sender' list to prevent your ISP's filter from
blocking future email messages. |
|
|
|
|
Copyright ©
1997-2012
The Howard Center: Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required. |
contact: webmaster
|
|